Risks Of Not Automating Account Payables With Software
AUTOMATED INVOICE ENTRY PROCESS INTO YOUR POS
Organizations of all sizes may struggle with the timely management of payables, but small and mid-sized companies may find this particularly challenging. common solution for improving accuracy, performance and process compliance is to consider an accounts payable automation system. As an executive looking to streamline this process, understanding the risks associated with ignoring this software can lead to more informed decision about whether to move forward with solution.
Foremost, inefficient payment cycles can expose organizations to delayed taxes, late-payment fees and damaged supplier relations. Disorganization within the payables team is predicted to increase the length of invoice approval, leading to longer wait to reimburse suppliers, thereby incurring late payment fees or other financial penalties. Furthermore, misplacing transaction information or failing to comprehend payment rules can result in missed deadlines and under-reported taxes.
Not employing an automated system may also lag auditing processes and result in non-compliance with internal policies. Typically, accounts payable automation solutions have features to ensure efficient and reliable verification of transaction history and review, including verifications of invoice data and the amounts listed. This, in turn, guards the company from potential typos, duplicate payments, and erroneous data entry. By relying on tedious manual methods of inputting data, human error can easily go undetected.
An additional risk of not adopting accounts payables automation software is the absence of reliable record keeping. Without complete and accurate records, auditing processes cannot be completed efficiently and other financial management duties, such as budgeting and forecasting, may fall short. The unmistakable result is decrease in the accuracy of the organizations financial analysis, leading to lack of timely decisions and strategy implementation.
In assessing the security of the system and the consequences of data breaches, the implementation of software system is more secure investment than manual approach. Automated accounts payable solutions are designed with tight security measures such as audit logging, encryption, company and user-level access preferences and as with other systems, potential consumers should ensure these features are included in the implemented package.
In conclusion, the risks of not using accounts payable automation software may vary, but they all have one common denominator: financial burdens, security repercussions and operational catastrophes. Executives should carefully weigh the risks and rewards of manual operations as compared to investing in automation solutions. When it comes to matter of finances, the latter’s value is unmistakable.
