Maximizing Efficiency In Accounts Payable Automations: Evaluating Ach And Eft
Which Is Faster Ach Or Eft
Many finance executives are looking for ways to streamline the accounts payable process to maximize efficiency and cost savings. Automating accounts payables can be daunting task with many different factors to consider. Two of the most common automation options available today are Automated Clearing House (ACH) and Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT). When determining which of these options is the most cost effective and efficient, one must take into account variety of factors.
Security is an important factor to consider when selecting an accounts payable automation software. Security breaches could lead to costly legal penalties and reputational damage. ACH is generally considered to be the more secure option because it is subject to inspection and auditing by the National Automation Clearinghouse Association (NACHA). On the other hand, EFTs are usually directly processed without an independent review, which increases the risk of fraudulent activities.
Another factor worth evaluating is transaction speed. ACH processes funds more slowly than EFT given its additional operational safeguards. Typically, ACH transactions can take up to several days to be cleared, whereas EFT transactions can take as little as seconds. In addition, clearing times for ACH transactions are most often affected by Federal Reserve and bank holidays, whereas EFTs are not. As such, when time is of the essence, EFT is likely the better option.
The cost of each service also is an important factor to consider. Many times, ACH is the less expensive option given its lower administrative costs and higher security. However, some service providers will charge additional fees for ACH, such as one-time setup fee and per-transaction fee. EFT costs can vary greatly, ranging from free to expensive, depending on the transaction size and type.
Finally, one should determine the cost-benefit of each service. cost benefit analysis enables one to see which choice is more attractive from purely economic point of view, taking into account factors such as capital requirements and return on investment. This analysis could reveal that ACH is more beneficial as larger initial investment may be required for EFT, or vice versa.
When selecting an accounts payable automation software, there are number of factors to take into account. After weighing the pros and cons of ACH and EFT, finance executives can be confident that they are choosing the best option available to them. Utilizing cost-benefit analysis and taking into account security, transaction speed, and cost, they can be sure they are making wise decision that will maximize their efficiency and cost savings.
